The most defensible short answer is that most of the 55 men who attended the 1787 Constitutional Convention were connected to traditional Christian churches, though they did not all hold the same beliefs. Biographical and denominational records commonly place roughly 50 to 52 delegates within Anglican/Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Congregationalist, Quaker, Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Dutch Reformed, or Methodist circles. The largest groups were Anglican/Episcopalian, Presbyterian, and Congregationalist. A small but influential minority in the wider founding generation held Christian-Deist, Unitarian, or otherwise unorthodox Enlightenment views. “Christian” therefore describes a broad founding-era religious world, not a single modern theological camp or a uniform public orthodoxy.
Denominational Breakdown of the 55 Constitutional Convention Delegates
A commonly cited survey of the Convention delegates identifies 52 church affiliations: 28 Anglican or Episcopalian, 8 Presbyterian, 7 Congregationalist, 2 each Lutheran, Dutch Reformed, Methodist, and Roman Catholic, and 1 Quaker. The three remaining delegates are often classified as deists or as religiously uncertain. These figures should be handled carefully. A man’s childhood church, parish membership, attendance, and private theology were not always the same thing.
| Affiliation | Commonly cited count | Notable delegates often associated with the tradition |
|---|---|---|
| Episcopalian / Anglican | 28 | George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton |
| Presbyterian | 8 | John Witherspoon, William Paterson, James Wilson |
| Congregationalist | 7 | Roger Sherman, Oliver Ellsworth, Abraham Baldwin |
| Quaker | 1 | John Dickinson, whose Quaker upbringing remained influential |
| Roman Catholic | 2 | Daniel Carroll, Thomas Fitzsimons |
| Lutheran | 2 | Jacob Broom, George Clymer |
| Dutch Reformed | 2 | John Lansing Jr., William Livingston |
| Methodist | 2 | Richard Bassett, William Few |
That is a map of affiliation, not a creed test. M. E. Bradford’s biographical study A Worthy Company is valuable precisely because it shows how much the delegates differed in practice, temperament, and conviction. Still, the overall picture is hard to miss: the Convention was not a gathering of secular atheists. It was drawn from a society whose public vocabulary, institutions, and moral habits had been formed largely by Protestant Christianity, with important Catholic and Quaker participation.
Were All the Founding Fathers Christian?
No. The phrase “Founding Fathers” is broader than the 55 Convention delegates. It can include revolutionary leaders such as Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, and John Jay—several of whom never attended the Convention. It also covers men whose beliefs changed over a long life. Treating every founder as a modern evangelical Christian is historically inaccurate; treating them all as secular unbelievers is inaccurate too.
Church affiliation in the eighteenth century often involved public worship, parish duties, family ties, and local standing. Biblical language was common in sermons, political argument, education, and ordinary correspondence. Yet Americans argued intensely about doctrine, revivalism, state support for churches, religious tests, and religious liberty. The Constitution did not establish a national church, and the First Amendment protected free exercise while barring a federal establishment. That arrangement makes more sense when the era is seen as religiously serious and denominationally diverse.
Which of the Founding Fathers Were Christian? Key Figures Examined
Orthodox and Devout Believers: John Jay, Roger Sherman, Samuel Adams, and Patrick Henry
John Jay was the first Chief Justice of the United States and later served as president of the American Bible Society. His public career joined constitutional statesmanship with an explicit Protestant commitment. Roger Sherman was a Reformed Congregationalist lay leader and the only founder to sign the Continental Association, the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution. His religious commitments did not make him identical to Jay, but they formed part of the moral world in which he reasoned about public duty.
Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry also spoke and acted from recognizably Christian convictions. Their faith was not an ornament added to politics after the fact; it shaped how they understood providence, liberty, virtue, and accountability. Those convictions did not settle every constitutional question, and they should not be used to erase the era’s disagreements or failures. They do, however, make it impossible to tell the story of the founding as though religious belief were absent from it.
Churchgoing Institutionalists: George Washington and James Madison
George Washington served on the vestry of his Anglican parish in Virginia and consistently used the language of Providence. In his 1796 Farewell Address, he wrote that “Religion and Morality are indispensable supports” of political prosperity. His personal piety remains debated, especially his sacramental practice, but his public conviction that civic life required moral formation is clear.
James Madison’s own theology was more guarded. He studied at the College of New Jersey under the Presbyterian minister John Witherspoon, staying after graduation to study Hebrew and law. Madison then became one of America’s strongest defenders of religious liberty, opposing coercive state religion rather than religious belief itself. His work shows why religious liberty was not simply a concession to unbelief; it was also a principle defended by people formed inside a religious culture.
Unorthodox and Providential Thinkers: Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams
Jefferson and Adams were not delegates to the 1787 Convention, but no account of the founding generation can ignore them. Jefferson admired the moral teachings of Jesus while rejecting miracles and orthodox claims about Christ’s divinity. In his 1803 letter to Benjamin Rush, he distinguished the “genuine precepts of Jesus himself” from what he considered later corruptions. Franklin was likewise unorthodox, yet at the Convention he appealed to active Providence, recalling that Americans had once prayed daily for “divine protection” and proposing that the delegates do so again.
John Adams moved toward Unitarian theology and rejected Trinitarian orthodoxy, but he did not treat religion as irrelevant to republican government. Writing to the Massachusetts militia in 1798, he warned that the Constitution was made “only for a moral and religious People.” These men complicate the record. They do not prove an atheist founding; they demonstrate that Christianity, reason, providence, and moral order were being argued over within the same generation.
Deism vs. Christianity in Early America: Clearing Up the Confusion
Strict European Deism pictured God as a distant clockmaker: a creator who set the universe in motion but did not intervene in its affairs. Some founders admired reason and criticized established churches, but that does not automatically make them strict deists. Many spoke of Providence as active in history, appealed to a Creator as the source of rights, and assumed that human beings stood under moral accountability.
Franklin’s 1787 plea for prayer is a useful example. He was not an orthodox churchman, but he did not speak as though Heaven were irrelevant to the Convention’s work. Washington, too, publicly treated religion and morality as supports for republican life. The historical distinction matters: an unorthodox believer in Providence is not the same as a secular atheist, and a church-affiliated founder is not automatically a doctrinal orthodox believer.
Why America's Moral and Cultural Foundations Matter Today
The founders did not hand later Americans a simple slogan. They left a constitutional order committed to liberty of conscience, along with a public culture that repeatedly connected freedom to character, duty, and moral restraint. Those are different things, but they were not unrelated in the minds of many early Americans.
That history matters because a nation does not live by institutions alone. Laws can protect liberty; they cannot by themselves form the habits that make liberty sustainable. Step Jones’s Christian America follows this larger question: what happens when a people lose touch with the beliefs, moral disciplines, and institutions that once shaped its common life? The answer begins with an honest record—not mythmaking, and not amnesia.
Continue the conversation
Explore Deeper in 'Christian America' by Step Jones
For readers who want to look beyond the familiar labels, Christian America traces the Protestant ideas and cultural changes that shaped the country’s public life. It asks what was gained, what was lost, and why America’s founding moral vocabulary still matters.